| Ingo Juergensmann 2004-07-16, 8:50 pm |
| On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:31:24PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Goswin von Brederlow (brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) wrote:
> It seems very pointless to complain often and loudly about a system if
> you're intending to replace it. Such energy would be better directed
> towards developing said replacment followed by much gloating. I just
> hope you decide to put it under an Open Source license. Of course, the
> impression I've gotten so far causes me to doubt that it will be.
Tsk... can you do something else than making pointless and false
speculations?
Multibuild will be properly licensed. It is intended to be a replacement for
w-b & co because it's a totally different design, that will result in
solving many/most current buildd problems of today. It will outperfom
w-b/buildd easily in building packages at overall speed.
And hey! It will even have documentation!!!11! I've started to make a
presentation last week, that will explain the differences and benefits of
multibuild over w-b/buildd.
--
Ciao... //
Ingo \X/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|