| Josselin Mouette 2004-07-16, 8:50 pm |
| On ven, 2004-07-16 at 21:50 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Oh, and to prevent other speculations:
> An uncooperating buildd admin can get a pain in the arse of many
> developers. The qt-x11-free horror in January is an example of this.
> I think that it will not help maintainers when they see a contact infos
> listed on buildd.net, but the buildd admin behind that address is ignorant
> and not cooperative at all. In that case the info on buildd.net is not
> worth being listed, because it doesn't help.
> Or to put it the other way around: the info on buildd.net can help
> maintainers when the buildd admin is cooperating.
True. My experience of the @buildd.d.o addresses is that the HP people
(responsible for ia64 and hppa) are very responsive, re-queuing stuff
when needed, but other requests seem to be dropped to /dev/null.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss@debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
|