| Mattia Dongili 2004-07-23, 7:51 am |
| On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:45:52 +0200,
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included
> mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no
> application that use mqueue library in main. This means user links
> mqueue library with his application with his hand.
>
> BTW, Enabling mqueue facility needs kernel support; it's good idea to
> support that sysvinit mount mqueue for conforming to the POSIX
> compliance if it's available like tmpfs + POSIX shared memory, in the
> future.
Right, AFAIK sarge installer boots with a 2.4 by default so the common
situation is that POSIX_MQUEUE is not available, thus, and for the
reasons expressed by Gotosan, I think patching debian glibc is not an
option.
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|