Debian Developers - Re: Release cycle length (was: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge)

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2004 > Re: Release cycle length (was: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge)





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Release cycle length (was: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge)
martin f krafft

2004-07-23, 5:53 pm

also sprach Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> [2004.07.23.1820 +0200]:
> The latter.
>
> Upgrade == downtime. Downtime every six months -> no.


short downtime every six months?
long downtime every two years?

who cares?

> Universities, for example, run on a 12-month cycle.


of course. every single one. clearly.

uni zürich would update quicker if releases were available.

--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!

.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system

Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com