|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2004 > Bug severity of broken binary compatibility
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Bug severity of broken binary compatibility
|
|
| Shaun Jackman 2004-07-28, 6:23 pm |
| What is the bug severity of a library that breaks binary compatibility
without bumping the soname?
Cheers,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Andreas Barth 2004-07-28, 6:23 pm |
| * Shaun Jackman (sjackman@telus.net) [040727 19:55]:
> What is the bug severity of a library that breaks binary compatibility
> without bumping the soname?
Grave, and if you mean libtiff, than this is already more than once in
the BTS (and a fixed package is waiting in NEW).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Shaun Jackman 2004-07-28, 6:23 pm |
| On Tue July 27, 2004 10h57, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Shaun Jackman (sjackman@telus.net) [040727 19:55]:
>
> Grave, and if you mean libtiff, than this is already more than once in
> the BTS (and a fixed package is waiting in NEW).
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
No, libfreetype6. See Bug #251473.
Cheers,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|