|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > August 2004 > is boost's build starved on mips-hawking?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
is boost's build starved on mips-hawking?
|
|
| Domenico Andreoli 2004-08-06, 7:51 am |
| hi,
anybody has news from mips buildd hawking? it has been hanging for some
days on glibc and i suspect something is waiting for human intervention.
same seems to apply to resume, which is hung on atari-fdisk. other
builders insted look crunching packages nicely.
please somebody do something 
cheers
domenico
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Stephen Frost 2004-08-06, 7:51 am |
| * Domenico Andreoli (cavok@debian.org) wrote:
> anybody has news from mips buildd hawking? it has been hanging for some
> days on glibc and i suspect something is waiting for human intervention.
This might be old news, but hawking does appear to be chugging along
doing something. It appears that r5k is doing it's thing too. I'm
guessing 'somebody' did 'something'.
Stephen
| |
| Domenico Andreoli 2004-08-06, 7:51 am |
| On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 08:31:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Domenico Andreoli (cavok@debian.org) wrote:
>
> This might be old news, but hawking does appear to be chugging along
> doing something. It appears that r5k is doing it's thing too. I'm
> guessing 'somebody' did 'something'.
>
then i'm not understanding why [0] continues to list glibc and boost at
the top but none of them actually is built. or somebody (is you?) did
something that is still not visible from buildd.debian.org?
thanks
domenico
[0] http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arc...&state=Building
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Stephen Frost 2004-08-06, 7:51 am |
| * Domenico Andreoli (cavok@debian.org) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 08:31:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> then i'm not understanding why [0] continues to list glibc and boost at
> the top but none of them actually is built. or somebody (is you?) did
> something that is still not visible from buildd.debian.org?
I really couldn't tell you what the story is there. It might be because
currently ftp is busted going from my network. I'm hoping to fix
that later today though (need to go back through and remove some of the
POM patches I applied which I think broke it...).
Stephen
| |
| Domenico Andreoli 2004-08-06, 7:51 am |
| On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 09:26:12AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Domenico Andreoli (cavok@debian.org) wrote:
>
> I really couldn't tell you what the story is there. It might be because
> currently ftp is busted going from my network. I'm hoping to fix
> that later today though (need to go back through and remove some of the
> POM patches I applied which I think broke it...).
>
ah.. ok. this probably starts to make sense... thanks ;)
dom
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Daniel Kobras 2004-08-06, 7:51 am |
| On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:04:42PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 08:31:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> then i'm not understanding why [0] continues to list glibc and boost at
> the top but none of them actually is built. or somebody (is you?) did
> something that is still not visible from buildd.debian.org?
The build failed, and the state remains at Building until someone
examines the build log and sets the state to Failed. See the log at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?...file=log&as=raw
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Domenico Andreoli 2004-08-06, 5:55 pm |
| On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:40:51PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:04:42PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>
> The build failed, and the state remains at Building until someone
> examines the build log and sets the state to Failed. See the log at
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?...file=log&as=raw
>
ah! i was not aware of this manual passage, it makes a lot more sense
than the busted ftp thesis of Stephen ) thank Daniel
if it can be of help, that build failed because of a broken symlink in
g++-3.3 1:3.3.4-4 (bug #260514) which has been fixed in -5.
now if some kind soul could set the boost state back to Failed and let
it have another chance of being built...
cheers
domenico
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Goswin von Brederlow 2004-08-06, 5:55 pm |
| Domenico Andreoli <cavok@debian.org> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 08:31:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> then i'm not understanding why [0] continues to list glibc and boost at
> the top but none of them actually is built. or somebody (is you?) did
> something that is still not visible from buildd.debian.org?
http://www.buildd.net/index-mips.html
shows hawking as waiting for setup. You can change this via the
[buildd admin login] link in the top corner on buildd.net.
It would be nice if you could add a
system("wget -q -O /dev/null \"http://www.buildd.net/cgi/status.phtml?name=$BUILDD_NET_USER&p=$BUILDD_NET_PASS&building=$PACKAGE\"");
to the buildd binary for the buildd (which $.... replaced by the real
values). I think a more exact patch was send on the m68k buildd list a
while back if you can't fiddle this in.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Stephen Frost 2004-08-06, 5:55 pm |
| * Goswin von Brederlow (brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) wrote:
> system("wget -q -O /dev/null \"http://www.buildd.net/cgi/status.phtml?name=$BUILDD_NET_USER&p=$BUILDD_NET_PASS&building=$PACKAGE\"");
Orrrr, how about, 'no'. Have a day.
Stephen
| |
| Goswin von Brederlow 2004-08-06, 5:55 pm |
| Domenico Andreoli <cavok@debian.org> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:40:51PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
>
> ah! i was not aware of this manual passage, it makes a lot more sense
> than the busted ftp thesis of Stephen ) thank Daniel
See http://buildd.net/
specifically http://people.debian.org/~wouter/wanna-build-states
or the graphical chart.
> if it can be of help, that build failed because of a broken symlink in
> g++-3.3 1:3.3.4-4 (bug #260514) which has been fixed in -5.
>
> now if some kind soul could set the boost state back to Failed and let
> it have another chance of being built...
Needs to be set back to "needs-build", fyi.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|