Debian Developers - libtiff: only 7 packages left!

Author

libtiff: only 7 packages left!

Jay Berkenbilt

2004-08-06, 5:55 pm

There are only seven packages left that are potentially holding up the
tiff transition. They are:

epplets
gnobog
libimager-perl
libtk-img
lightspeed
mountapp
qvwm

In addition to these, the following packages haven't been handled but
aren't in sarge and therefore shouldn't interfere with the transition:

k3d
sear
pixieplus

and the following have been uploaded but haven't been processed far
enough to close their RC bugs (so no additional action is required):

gtksee
autotrace
gandalf

--
Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
http://www.ql.org/q/

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Stephen Frost

2004-08-06, 5:55 pm

* Jay Berkenbilt (ejb@ql.org) wrote:
> There are only seven packages left that are potentially holding up the
> tiff transition. They are:
>
> epplets

yea, yea, I'll be uploading a new version later today. Probably not
before the dinstall run, but it'll be with 'urgency=medium'. I've
already got it built and stuff, I just need to fix some ftp problems
I've got w/ my network.

Stephen

Steve Langasek

2004-08-06, 5:55 pm

On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:08:11AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:

> There are only seven packages left that are potentially holding up the
> tiff transition. They are:

> epplets

epplets is being addressed by its maintainer.

> gnobog

Jordi Mallach has been having problems getting this one to build, due to
some issue with jade.

> libimager-perl
> libtk-img
> lightspeed
> mountapp
> qvwm

> In addition to these, the following packages haven't been handled but
> aren't in sarge and therefore shouldn't interfere with the transition:

> k3d
> sear
> pixieplus

Oh, damn. Well, k3d is building here anyway, and will hopefully be
uploaded soon.

> and the following have been uploaded but haven't been processed far
> enough to close their RC bugs (so no additional action is required):

> gtksee
> autotrace
> gandalf

I don't think so. The gandalf package was uploaded, but did not
actually fix the package so that it was buildable with libtiff4; that
bug has been reopened. autotrace has been uploaded, but didn't close
the bug in the changelog; someone needs to follow up and confirm the bug
is fixed (though it seems to be building, so it probably is).

There is no sign of a successful gtksee upload; this package still
requires attention.

--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Marek Habersack

2004-08-06, 5:55 pm

On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:08:11AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt scribbled:
>
> There are only seven packages left that are potentially holding up the
> tiff transition. They are:
Got a dumb question. I've uploaded all the pikes (pike7.2, pike7.4, pike7.6)
shortly after the issue popped up, fixed as necessary. Some architectures
built them, some failed to and some didn't even attempt. So, should I wait
till all the packages are uploaded and then re-upload, or ask the
architecture builders to re-build the package or just wait for the
autobuilders to pick up the packages again?

thanks,

marek

Andreas Metzler

2004-08-07, 2:47 am

On 2004-08-06 Marek Habersack <grendel@debian.org> wrote:
[...]
> Got a dumb question. I've uploaded all the pikes (pike7.2, pike7.4, pike7.6)
> shortly after the issue popped up, fixed as necessary. Some architectures
> built them, some failed to and some didn't even attempt. So, should I wait
> till all the packages are uploaded and then re-upload, or ask the
> architecture builders to re-build the package or just wait for the
> autobuilders to pick up the packages again?

Wait. See <http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week.png>.
cu andreas

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org