Debian Developers - Re: Release update: base and standard frozen

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > August 2004 > Re: Release update: base and standard frozen





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Release update: base and standard frozen
Petter Reinholdtsen

2004-08-08, 5:51 pm

[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> Well, one can do something about the build ordering. Packages which
> many packages build-depending on them should be given priority. And
> packages could be sorted in build-depend order, to avoid trying to
> build package foo before it's build-dependency libbar only to see it
> fail.


[Wouter Verhelst]
> That is already done, for as much as is possible with the current state
> of things. Don't expect stuff to magically be fixed when there's little
> time...


Ah, very good. It must be a new feature since the last time I knew
how this worked.

Is it also looking at the time since the upload, or can low-priority
packages "starve"? Looking at
<URL:http://developer.skolelinux.no/info...istdiff.html.gz> I
suspect so, as www-sql was uploaded 40 days ago and are still not
built on alpha.

Is the buildd ordering algorithm documented anywhere? It would be
interesting to read how the packages are sorted for building.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com