Debian Developers - Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > August 2004 > Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
Justin Pryzby

2004-08-13, 2:50 am

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:25:10PM -0400, pryzbyj wrote:
> Well said.
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:55:40PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:25:10PM -0400, pryzbyj wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> derivitive forms is okay. Indeed, in the case of java, I don't think it
> will matter 0.02 worth who compiles it. Java is reverse compilable, so
> I think the bytecode will be the same either way. Can someone confirm
> this? Then, it'd be nice if we could allow for upstream binaries to be


I just confirmed that Java bytecode _can_ vary. Two compilations with
sun's compiler resulted in identical output, but the output was
different than that produced by kaffe (which also produced two identical
binaries).

Justin

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com