Debian Developers - Re: Accepted mindi-partimagehack 0.6.2-2.1 (i386 source)

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > August 2004 > Re: Accepted mindi-partimagehack 0.6.2-2.1 (i386 source)





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Accepted mindi-partimagehack 0.6.2-2.1 (i386 source)
Joshua Kwan

2004-08-28, 8:48 pm

Amaya Rodrigo Sastre wrote:
> mindi-partimagehack (0.6.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * NMU to fix libraries XXXXup.


Please, people, can we keep changelog entries more or less G-rated?

You can curse bugs all you want on IRC, but remember that stuff like
this gets seen by important people who may want to judge Debian based on
things like this. And it's really not worth it, heh.

I've recently found myself censoring some of Zephaniah Hull's angsty gpm
changelog entries...

--
Joshua Kwan

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com