| Scott James Remnant 2004-08-29, 5:52 pm |
| On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 19:09 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sorry, I can't respect your wish not to add the file but we could
> compromise with a file like the other non sid archs have with "No
> essential packages list is available for amd64 in sid" if that is your
> wish.
>
If you're happy for the file to say that, then that's ok; I agree to
this compromise.
That wasn't so hard now, was it?
You'd find people a lot more willing to work with you if you offered
more help and agreed to more compromises than you threaten with NMUs.
>
> Yeah, and amd64 can't be added to sid till it has build-essential and
> it can't have build-essential till it is in sid and it can't be in sid
> till it has build-essential.....
>
Who said that? Let me know and I'll go and apply appropriate percussive
force to them. build-essential is *not* a policy package, it simply
documents the current state of the archive.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
|