| Michelle Konzack 2004-09-02, 6:55 pm |
| Am 2004-08-30 14:42:59, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de> writes:
> Instead of a diff may I suggest sorting Packages in the Packages by
> date of change, i.e. add new entries to the end. We have many packages
> that don't change for a year and those entries would drift to the top.
Agree
> Now how does that help? The Packages file would only have minimal
> changes at the start (hopefully none in the first half or more) and
> big changes concentrated at the end. Rsyncing the Packages file would
> be improved greatly.
Du you have already tried to take a "Packages" file in /var/lib/apt/lists
and the download (!!!) the "Packages" file from the next day...
Now filter all Packages which are new or changed... and you will get a
small "diff"
Attach this file with 'cat' to the "Packages" file in /var/lib/apt/lists
and ich you try to install one of the changed packages, apt get will
detect the TWO entries for the same package during "check depends"
and choose the newer one automaticly...
Tested with WOOD 3.0r2 and all security updates
> One could also write a server (cgi script?) that, given the last entry
> in the clients Packages file, sends all entries (new packages) after
> that entry. The client would then add that to its Packages file (and
> possibly remove the obsolete entries).
:-)
>
> And the description file would be localized.
They are already localized "Packages" files, but they are rather old
But what about a Database which hold all packages and its translations
in one big table and then "subscribed" Translators can update Packages
"Online" ?
A database of this kind is very easyly to maintain...
> MfG
> Goswin
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
|