Debian Developers - Bug#267955: kmd should be rebuild against new binutils?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > September 2004 > Bug#267955: kmd should be rebuild against new binutils?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Bug#267955: kmd should be rebuild against new binutils?
Steve Langasek

2004-09-03, 5:52 pm

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:43:48PM +0200, Djoumé SALVETTI wrote:

> Steve Langasek wrote :


[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> If my understanding is correct, kmd only need to be rebuilt (no change
> in the package) on sid. So is there any developper to NMU with no change this
> package to avoid it being removed from sarge?


There's more to it than that. Given that binutils doesn't export its
library version number as part of a package name, third-party packages
should really not be dynamically linking against it. This really needs
for kmd to be linked statically against libbfd if it's going to be
included in a stable release.

--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com