Debian Developers - Re: Buildds slow/unuseable -> drop that arch

Author

Re: Buildds slow/unuseable -> drop that arch

Hamish Moffatt

2004-09-04, 2:48 am

On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:10:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Eduard Bloch:
>
>
> In some cases, fringe architectures have helped Debian to improve as a
> whole (for example, when they switched to a new GCC version before the
> main distribution and provided hints of what has to be changed).

So it's a good idea for us to continue to support fringe architectures
in unstable. Is it necessary for them to be released, and influence
'testing'?

Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org