Debian Developers - Re: FTFBS in sarge

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > September 2004 > Re: FTFBS in sarge





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: FTFBS in sarge
Steve Langasek

2004-09-04, 5:51 pm

On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 04:07:37PM -0500, Robin Verduijn wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Meta-CVS has failed for over a year to get into testing due to a bug in
> clisp. Since that[1] does not seem to be actively worked on fixing (by
> the clisp maintainer nor by the mips porters), the only way for mcvs
> to propagate to testing now is if its MIPS package is removed from the
> testing archives. I filed a bug[2] for that almost 3 months ago. Should
> I bump its severity up higher (it's now "serious") or will that make no
> difference?


I don't imagine it makes a difference. Severities are a rather fuzzy
concept where ftp.debian.org is concerned.

You may want to get mcvs added to P-a-s
(http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff...s-arch-specific), as this
makes the case for removal from the archive clearer.

--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com