| Mike Fedyk 2004-09-06, 5:51 pm |
| Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
>On Thursday 02 September 2004 18.34, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
>
>
>Why? I expect that by the time etch is released, kernel 2.6 is basically
>ubiquitous, so I think it's sensible to only provide the 2.6-enabled binary
>as a Debian package. Perhaps just make it easy to build for kernel 2.4 in
>the source package for those who want it (and point to it in
>README.Debian.) This is just MHO, obviously.
>
Then you don't realise that a *lot* of people will be sticking with 2.4
kernels for a while and the fact that 2.4 kernels will be in sarge means
you have to support them in your packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|