Debian Developers - Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > September 2004 > Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV
Goswin von Brederlow

2004-09-07, 5:58 pm

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:43:33PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Are you really asking for people who objected to your application to
> come forward publically on this mailing list?


I would expect them to at least tell me if they have a problem with me
so I can change or stop bothering them. A lot of things can be cleared
up over a drink or a pizza resulting in everyone being much
happier. And debian-devel would be the wrong list for NM things
anyway.

Rejection mails are not public unless the rejecty chooses to make it
public. If people feel a NM is not suitable for Debian then they
should have enough conviction to risk getting their opinion made
public by the rejecty or hold their breath.

I also think that as rejecty I'm entitled to face my accusers and I
can take the "their comments" only for what they are: hear-say. But
thats just me.

> --
> Steve Langasek
> postmodern programmer


MfG
Goswin

PS: contacting an NM and trying to work out problems during the NM
process instead of just tell the DAM to reject him/her would be even
better.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com