Debian Developers - Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > September 2004 > Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV
Goswin von Brederlow

2004-09-07, 5:58 pm

Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2004.bluespice.org> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:42:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm, this is weird.
> As a long term Linux user and especially a DD, I thought you would know that
> having physical access to the machines (nearly always) means having root
> access as well.
>
>
> Yes, and what's one of the reasons why it's no longer >400-600 packages?
>
>
> That's what I (and others) are telling since last year. Some archs don't
> have a hardware problem, but a personal problem.
> But it's nice to see you agreeing with my POV in this regard...
>
>
> It might surprise you that for some strange (Murphys law) reasons buildds
> tend to have problems at once, not one by one in row... So, having just n+1
> redundancy might not be enough.
>
>
> I don't know who pays your power bills, but I have to pay mine by myself and
> with the increasing power costs here in Germany I tend to power off machines
> that are not needed atm. So, why should I run a power consuming machine that
> just builds 1-2 packages a day, being idle the most time?
> But it makes sense to power them on when there's a bigger backlog.
> Nobody needs to tell me when it's necessary to turn my machines on/off. I
> have eyes in my head and can track the graphs on buildd.net or buildd.d.o by
> myself. Yes, I've obtained that skill during my 4 years work running an
> official buildd, so I can judge on my own when an additional machine makes
> sense and when not.
>
> --
> Ciao... //
> Ingo \X/


I have to agree with both of you and both Ingo and I have said
multiple times in the past that Debian needs more buildds (and Debian
has gotten more) and more variance in the buildd admin (which is still
way to centered around single persons).

Also buildds that act like a "hot-spare" disk in a raid and can be
turned on in a days notice are a great way to take over in case of
hardware or person problems. They can be at peoples homes where they
normaly wouldn't run 24/7 without any problem since they would only
bee needed in emergencies for a few days.

Call them official buildds in reserve if it makes you feel better.
They could still be the fast acting desaster relieve I talked about.

MfG
Goswin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com