Debian Developers - Bug#273420: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-sv -- Mozilla Firefox Swedish Language/Region

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > September 2004 > Bug#273420: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-sv -- Mozilla Firefox Swedish Language/Region





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Bug#273420: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-sv -- Mozilla Firefox Swedish Language/Region
Johan Svedberg

2004-09-25, 8:49 pm

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name : mozilla-firefox-locale-sv
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Mikael Hedberg <hedberg@novasphere.net>
* URL : http://www.mozilla.se/firefox.shtml
* License : MPA
Description : Mozilla Firefox Swedish Language/Region Package

Swedish Menu/Message resource and Region property package for Mozilla Firefox.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.iso-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.iso-8859-1 (ignored: LC_ALL set to sv_SE)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Johan Svedberg

2004-09-26, 5:55 pm

* Sep 26 12:22 Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>:
> Le vendredi 17 septembre 2004 à 19:20 +0200, Johan Svedberg a écrit :
>
> Nothing against this specific package, but am I the only one to find
> all these mozilla-*-locale-* source packages are a huge waste of human
> resources and a complete mess for our users? Specific language
> packages for big hogs like KDE or OOo make sense, but we have already
> 42 separate *source* packages for mozilla l10n stuff, all having to be
> upgraded simultaneously with every new mozilla version.
>
> If mozilla's upstream is not able to deal with i18n at all, maybe we
> could start a central mozilla-locale project, at least to group all
> these sources in a single package for which upgrades would be easier.


I agree. It would be great if something like that could be co-ordinated.

Again, sorry about the multiple ITP:s. How come relaying on master is
laggning so much?

--
Johan Svedberg, johan@svedberg.pp.se, http://johan.svedberg.pp.se/

Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo

2004-09-26, 5:55 pm

On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 01:44:09PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
> * Sep 26 12:22 Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>:
>
> I agree. It would be great if something like that could be co-ordinated.
>
> Again, sorry about the multiple ITP:s. How come relaying on master is
> laggning so much?



Perhaps opening a project on Alioth with a mailing list, and then
"calling" other maintainers is a first step... pity that Alioth is a
bit "unreliable" right now

Cheers,

--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
jsogo@debian.org

Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

2004-09-27, 5:56 pm

On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 01:44:09PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
>
> I agree. It would be great if something like that could be co-ordinated.


I agree too. Actually, it makes more sense if we do a single package and
integrate there mechanisms to extract the needed files from xpis to
generate mozilla-locale-* packages instead of having each maintainer devise
its own (as well as redoing the registration of the packages in mozilla as
documented at [1])

Moreover, somebody (a packaging group) could just package the locale
definitions available for Mozilla [2], Firefox [3] and Thunderbird [3],
update them from time to time and update them whenever a new release is
produced. That would avoid all the bugs related to XXXX-locale-YYY
packages not allowing transitions of new Mozilla|Firefox|Thunderbird
versions because they have not been updated and having the binary package
proceed into testing would break them.

I believe that's actually how Mozilla is integrated in other OS, for
example, in Solaris IIRC.

Regards

Javier


[1] http://www.mozilla.org/projects/l10n/mlp_distrib.html
[2] http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla....illa/l10n/lang/
[3]
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla....trib-localized/
[4]http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/XXXXX/contrib-localized/

Mike Hommey

2004-09-27, 5:56 pm

On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 06:42:23PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> I agree too. Actually, it makes more sense if we do a single package and
> integrate there mechanisms to extract the needed files from xpis to
> generate mozilla-locale-* packages instead of having each maintainer devise
> its own (as well as redoing the registration of the packages in mozilla as
> documented at [1])


For that you need no more than call update-mozilla*-chrome scripts.

Mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com