Debian Developers - Hal should not depend on udev (was Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing s

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > January 2005 > Hal should not depend on udev (was Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing s





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Hal should not depend on udev (was Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing s
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

2005-01-31, 5:56 pm

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
>
> It "depends" on udev in the sense of a package dependency; on 2.4 kernels
> the udev package is a no-op, and GNOME runs with diminished volume
> management functionality, AIUI.


So it is a bug in hal: bad usage of "Depends". It should be a Suggests, really.
And if it cannot be a Suggests because of package replacements and so on, at
most a Recommends.

"Diminished functionality" where things don't break certainly is not ground
for a Depends. One could argue for Recommends, but IMHO that's it. And I'd
go with Suggests.

--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com