Debian Developers -

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > January 2005





Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmBug#271567: Can you disables the "locking" of the keyboard, mouse, ...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmBug#271567: Can you disables the "locking" of the keyboard, mouse, ...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmBug#271567: Can you disables the "locking" of the keyboard, mouse, ...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmRe: [Fwd: Re: status of the DDTP project?]
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 5:54 pmBug#271567: Can you disables the "locking" of the keyboard, mouse, ...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:48 amBug#290276: RFA: alevt -- X11 Teletext/Videotext browser
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:48 amBug#271567: Can you disables the "locking" of the keyboard, mouse, ...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:48 amBug#290257: ITP: tpg -- Toy Parser Generator - a parser generator for python
Posts(11)January 13, 2005, 2:54 amremoved start links are back after upgrade
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 2:54 amRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 2:54 amRe: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 2:54 amRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 8:48 pmBug#271567: Can you disables the "locking" of the keyboard, mouse, ...
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 8:48 pmBug#271567: Can you disables the "locking" of the keyboard, mouse, ...
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 8:48 pmRe: partial patches - server application
Posts(24)January 12, 2005, 8:48 pmPHP application packaging policy/best practice?
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 8:48 pm_AMS_SOFTWARE_
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#290131: ITP: mocp -- ncurses based console audio player
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(7)January 12, 2005, 5:56 pmHow to build libapache-mod
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 2:54 amRe: removed start links are back after upgrade
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 2:54 amRe: Status
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 2:54 amBug#289973: ITP: didiwiki -- simple WikiWikiWeb implementation with built-in webserver
Posts(10)January 12, 2005, 2:54 amrudeness in changelogs
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 2:54 amRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(15)January 12, 2005, 2:54 amManpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included
Posts(4)January 11, 2005, 5:56 pmTool to provide fake dependencies
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: soname number in name of dev-package?
Posts(242)January 11, 2005, 7:51 amLCC and blobs
Posts(6)January 11, 2005, 7:51 amBug#289385: RFH: cdrtools -- searching co-maintainer for the package
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 7:51 amsoname number in name of dev-package? (was: ok, i screwed up)
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 7:51 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(16)January 11, 2005, 7:51 amok, i screwed up
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 7:51 amRe: Bug #267273: cdrecord and 2.6.x bug possibly fixed
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 2:48 amBug#267273: Bug #267273: cdrecord and 2.6.x bug possibly fixed
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 2:48 amRe: System snapshots
Posts(25)January 11, 2005, 2:48 amDebianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 8:51 pmRe: remove me
Posts(66)January 10, 2005, 8:51 pmmurphy is listed on spamcop
Posts(11)January 10, 2005, 5:58 pmWhy does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC and bl
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(3)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmremove me
Posts(5)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmSerious problem with the tty terminal - HELP!
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: remove me from call*wave
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmBug#289722: ITP: kde-systray2 -- KDE systray applet with icon hiding support
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmBug#289712: ITP: libncar-graphics -- scientific visualization suite from UCAR
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRE: Mail Delivery (failure sales@makelabel.com)
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmNFS Trouble using custom install CD w/ linux-2.4.27-1
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pmRe: System snapshots
Posts(3)January 10, 2005, 5:57 pma project with libglib2.0-dev
Posts(1)January 10, 2005, 2:51 amBug#289632: ITP: BrlCAD -- A Combinatorial/Constructive Solid Geometry, solid modeling
Posts(18)January 10, 2005, 2:51 amStatus of Kernel 2.4.28 packages?
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC a
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 8:47 pmBug#289545: ITP: gromit -- GTK based tool to make annotations on screen
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#289537: O: systrace
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC a
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC a
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#289504: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: alt-gr key NOT WORKING !)
Posts(2)January 9, 2005, 5:56 pmPlease test exim4 4.43 in experimental
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: [Fwd: Re: status of the DDTP project?]
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 5:56 pmProcessed: Re: Bug#289504: bugs.debian.org: alt-gr key NOT WORKING !
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 7:47 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 7:47 amWhy is it taking so long?
Posts(6)January 9, 2005, 2:47 amDDTP problems
Posts(3)January 9, 2005, 2:47 amstatus of the DDTP project?
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 2:47 amProcessed: Re: Bug#289416: general: Typo's in dutch messages for dpkg and cat(libc?)
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 2:47 amBug#289416: general: Typo's in dutch messages for dpkg and cat(libc?)
Posts(1)January 9, 2005, 2:47 amRe: [Fwd: Re: status of the DDTP project?]
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 8:48 pmBug#289416: general: Typo's in dutch messages for dpkg and cat(libc?)
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 8:48 pmBug#289392: ITP: anagramarama -- fast paced anagram puzzle game using SDL
Posts(5)January 8, 2005, 8:48 pmPrint Alternative
Posts(4)January 8, 2005, 5:50 pmNew author/maintainer for pinfo needed
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 5:50 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 5:50 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 5:50 pmBug#289371: ITP: saods9 -- astronomical image tool
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 5:50 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 5:50 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 5:50 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 7:47 amBug#289307: ITP: pwc -- Free Philips USB Webcam driver for Linux replacing the old pwc
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 2:48 amRe: Bug#289043: ITP: perlprimer -- [Biology] Graphical design of primers for PCR
Posts(1)January 8, 2005, 2:48 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmBug#289043: ITP: perlprimer -- [Biology] Graphical design of primers for PCR
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmavoid being built against libflac-dev 1.1.1-1, and upload soon
Posts(2)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmcourier-maildrop vs maildrop
Posts(3)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmBug#289062: ITP: kwin-deco-crystalgl -- KDE OpenGL-enabled 'Crystal' windeco
Posts(3)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmQuestion about GFDL
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmBug#289176: ITP: yacpi -- ncurses based acpi monitor for text mode
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 5:59 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 7:48 amRe: PHP application packaging policy/best practice?
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 7:48 amBug#289132: ITP: ooo2dbk -- OpenOffice.org SXW to DocBook XML translator
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 7:48 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 7:48 amRe: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 7:48 amRe: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 7:48 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 7:48 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 2:48 amBug#289043: ITP: perlprimer -- [Biology] Graphical design of primers for PCR
Posts(1)January 7, 2005, 2:48 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(9)January 7, 2005, 2:48 amExperimental gaim_1.1.1-2 for Alpha
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 8:52 pmBug#289065: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 8:52 pmBug#289065: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 8:51 pmBug#289065: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 8:51 pmRe: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 8:51 pmRe: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 8:51 pmBug#289065: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#289043: ITP: perlprimer -- [Biology] Graphical design of primers for PCR
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmUnidentified subject!
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(13)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmGtkMozEmbed with Firefox not Mozilla
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#128818: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Ignoring the truth or Hiding problems? (was: Are mails sent toxxxx <at> bui
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#288959: ITP: mn-fit -- interactive analysis package for fitting data and histogram
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amBug#128818: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amBug#128818: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amRe: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amBug#128818: partial patches - server application
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 7:53 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 2:51 amRe: Ignoring the truth or Hiding problems? (was: Are mails sent to xxxx <at> bui
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 2:51 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 2:51 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 2:51 amRe: Ignoring the truth or Hiding problems? (was: Are mails sent to xxxx <at> bui
Posts(1)January 6, 2005, 2:51 amRe: New stable version after Sarge
Posts(3)January 6, 2005, 2:51 amCant build a simple package.
Posts(3)January 6, 2005, 2:51 amBug#288769: ITP: cedilla -- ascii to postscript renderer


Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com