|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > October 2005 > force jack-audio-connection-kit into testing ?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
force jack-audio-connection-kit into testing ?
|
|
| Guenter Geiger 2005-10-07, 8:48 pm |
|
Hi there,
I just tried to figure out why the jack-audio-connection-kit can't go
into testing, and after some investigation I came to the conclusion
that it might never go in without help. [1]
Is there someone who shares this opinion or am I missing something ?
For my part, I would be happier if all my packages depending on jackd get
thrown out of testing in order to reenter later. With all the changes that
go on everywhere it is almost impossible to keep all the packages that
have to go with jack reasonably bugfree for a long enough time.
Cheers,
Guenter
[1] An example:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing...ge=sooperlooper
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Junichi Uekawa 2005-10-08, 2:50 am |
| Hi,
> I just tried to figure out why the jack-audio-connection-kit can't go
> into testing, and after some investigation I came to the conclusion
> that it might never go in without help. [1]
>
> Is there someone who shares this opinion or am I missing something ?
> For my part, I would be happier if all my packages depending on jackd get
> thrown out of testing in order to reenter later. With all the changes that
> go on everywhere it is almost impossible to keep all the packages that
> have to go with jack reasonably bugfree for a long enough time.
I think jack was one of those packages that always needed a manual
kick; and we really need a freeze to get testing up to shape.
I agree that at this stage it might be good enough just to kick a few
packages out of testing to let it propagate.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Free Ekanayaka 2005-10-10, 7:54 am |
| |--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Hi,[vbcol=seagreen]
JU> I think jack was one of those packages that always needed a manual
JU> kick; and we really need a freeze to get testing up to shape.
JU> I agree that at this stage it might be good enough just to kick a few
JU> packages out of testing to let it propagate.
As far as I understand jack-audio-connection-kit is blocked by libarts
which is in turned blocked by qt-x11-free, which FTBFS on hppa:
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/sta...11-free&arches=
would fixing the compilation make the whole thing move cleanly to
testing? Or am I missing more complex issues?
Cheers,
Free
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Adeodato Simó 2005-10-10, 7:54 am |
| * Free Ekanayaka [Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:54:01 +0100]:
> would fixing the compilation make the whole thing move cleanly to
> testing? Or am I missing more complex issues?
With the current implementation of testing, qt-x11-free has to go into
testing together with a lot of packages, including all of KDE.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|