Debian Developers - Re: postinst scripts failing because a new conffile wasn't accepted: Is it a bug?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > October 2005 > Re: postinst scripts failing because a new conffile wasn't accepted: Is it a bug?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: postinst scripts failing because a new conffile wasn't accepted: Is it a bug?
Roberto C. Sanchez

2005-10-31, 5:59 pm

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 07:52:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> You mean the postinst script should succeed even if the program is not
> able to work? This doesn't fit with the meaning of "Depends", because
> other packages declare a Depends exactly because they want to use the
> program, they want it to function. If they cannot rely on it's working
> after the postinst has completed successfully, this a severe bug IMO.
>


What you are describing sounds like a Pre-Depends. That is, package y
Depends on package x being installed and properly configured before
package y can be installed.

-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com