Debian Developers - Re: texlive-basic_2005-1_i386.changes REJECTED

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > November 2005 > Re: texlive-basic_2005-1_i386.changes REJECTED





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: texlive-basic_2005-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Rogério Brito

2005-11-28, 7:50 am

On Nov 28 2005, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Dismissing comments favoring this hyphenation - in unison - as
> expressions of personal taste doesn't really reflect the fact that
> consistency is a quality Debian users look for in packages.


Agreed. Debian users look for consistency in the same way that
development packages are called foo-dev, documentation packages are
called foo-doc and some packages share content via foo-common packages,
just to name a few things.

> If you provide the TeX live names in the long description, people will
> be able to find stuff by the usual package search functions.


I think that this would be a nice suggestion for Norbert. If I were
maintaining the packages, this would be something that I would actually
adopt, to conform to the practices of both worlds. A good compromise,
IMVHO.

Of course, the packages are his and he decides how to name what.


Regards, Rogério Brito.

--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@ime.usp.br : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito
Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de
Homepage on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tetex-maint-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com