|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > February 2005 > Would like to remove blas/lapack/atlas2/lapack99 at some point
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Would like to remove blas/lapack/atlas2/lapack99 at some point
|
|
| Camm Maguire 2005-02-23, 6:10 pm |
| Greetings! The older versions were kept to ease the transition into a
minor API change, and to work around earlier gcc-induced tester
failures. There are just a few packages using the older API now.
I've filed wishlist bugs with those requesting an upgrade about 100
days ago. How should we proceed now? Maintaining both sets is
becoming more burdensome.
Please cc me directly as I'm not subscribed to this list.
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
========================================
==================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Kevin B. McCarty 2005-02-23, 6:10 pm |
| Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! The older versions were kept to ease the transition into a
> minor API change, and to work around earlier gcc-induced tester
> failures. There are just a few packages using the older API now.
> I've filed wishlist bugs with those requesting an upgrade about 100
> days ago. How should we proceed now? Maintaining both sets is
> becoming more burdensome.
Hi Camm,
When we exchanged emails a while ago after your wishlist bug against
libmathlib1, I think you were intending to have the old blas/lapack/etc.
removed only after the release of Sarge. Is that still the case?
It would make things difficult for me if blas/lapack/atlas2 disappeared
now, since I would have to bump sonames on most of Cernlib, change
library package names, and somehow get the new binary packages through
NEW and into testing before the release. After Sarge, I have no objections.
As far as I'm concerned you can have lapack99 removed right now, since
it's not just one, but two sonames behind the current version.
regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University
GPG public key ID: 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Camm Maguire 2005-02-24, 6:02 pm |
| Hi Kevin! Of course, post-Sarge is just fine! Please excuse me if I
implied otherwise. You and I have already coordinated on this. If
memory serves, libmathlib1 is not the only issue. mpqc, ghemical, and
tela are there too. I'm checking the BTS, and can't find the
analogous wishlist bugs against these which I thought I had filed at
the same time. I guess my post boiled down to whether it would be
appropriate to NMU a blas/lapack upgrade on these, after of course
ensuring that sufficient time passes after the maintainer is
contacted. Or perhaps the best way is to, just after sarge, remove
the packages and allow nature to take its course? How much time is
left for Sarge anyway? I've already received more bug reports on
these packages than I had anticipated could arrive pre-sarge. I
suppose it is worth fixing them?
Thanks so much for your great work on supporting cernlib!
Take care,
"Kevin B. McCarty" <kmccarty@Princeton.EDU> writes:
> Camm Maguire wrote:
>
>
> Hi Camm,
>
> When we exchanged emails a while ago after your wishlist bug against
> libmathlib1, I think you were intending to have the old blas/lapack/etc.
> removed only after the release of Sarge. Is that still the case?
>
> It would make things difficult for me if blas/lapack/atlas2 disappeared
> now, since I would have to bump sonames on most of Cernlib, change
> library package names, and somehow get the new binary packages through
> NEW and into testing before the release. After Sarge, I have no objections.
>
> As far as I'm concerned you can have lapack99 removed right now, since
> it's not just one, but two sonames behind the current version.
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu> Physics Department
> WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University
> GPG public key ID: 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
========================================
==================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|