Debian Developers - Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > March 2005 > Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
David Weinehall

2005-03-31, 6:26 pm

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
>
>
> I had to modify my BIOS in order to get my laptop to work with my
> wireless card. This would have been rather a lot easier if I'd had the
> source code.
>
>
> I would say that "If software of class X is distributed sometimes burned
> into hardware, then Debian distributing other software of class X would
> not have a significant impact upon the rights of our users". As far as


I think that's a *very* slippery slope. Think embedded devices; a lot
of them has the software on flash or even as ROMs. Would this software
be acceptable in main just because it was available on ROM too?

> freedom is concerned, both types are equivilently bad. The choice is
> either:


> 1) Distribute the non-free firmware. Our users are happy.


Sure, as long as we distribute it in *non-free* where it belongs.

[snip]


Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@debian.org> /) Rime on my window (\
// ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com