| Adam Heath 2005-03-15, 6:00 pm |
| On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Julien BLACHE wrote:
>
>
> Probably. On the other hand, I think that the coverage we get from testing
> is a lot higher than from unstable, by the simple fact that more people
> risk using testing as their day-to-day system. (I wouldn't dream of
> installing Unstable on my "Real Work" system. Testing? No problem.)
Interesting idea. The increased coverage most likely leads to more problems
being found, which means more time is needed to fix them. In the end, this
leads to a better release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|