Debian Developers - Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > March 2005 > Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Henning Makholm

2005-03-15, 6:00 pm

Scripsit Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>
> This one time, at band camp, Henning Makholm said:


[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> No. The actual line is:


> | We project that applying these rules for etch will reduce the set of
> | candidate architectures from 11 to approximately 4 [...]


> "We project that the architectures that will have enough porter support"
> is not the same as "We refuse to allow any but the following".


The point is still that some architectures are going to be left out in
the dark. That's the purpose of the whole plan.

> It is not a pronouncement, it is proposal,


And how does its being a proposal mean that it can't be criticized?
Indeed it is only because it is a proposal that it makes sense to
criticize it at all.

--
Henning Makholm "They discussed old Tommy Somebody and Jerry Someone Else."


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com