Debian Developers - Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > March 2005 > Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Bill Allombert

2005-03-19, 7:47 am

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:13:07AM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:44:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>
> a) is true for some big packages like GNOME and KDE, but that
> does not impede the architecture's usefulness for other software
> we have in the archive.


Also it is an example of ridiculously large source packages, which
create other problems by themself like the amount of bandwidth wasted
when one has to apply a one-line fix, in particular for security updates.

Why not considering splitting those source packages? IIRC, this is
planned for the X11 source packages. This seems a better option overall.

Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com