Debian Developers - Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > March 2005 > Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Andreas Rottmann

2005-03-19, 8:51 pm

Bill Allombert <ballombe@master.debian.org> writes:

> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:13:07AM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
>
> Also it is an example of ridiculously large source packages, which
> create other problems by themself like the amount of bandwidth wasted
> when one has to apply a one-line fix, in particular for security updates.
>
> Why not considering splitting those source packages? IIRC, this is
> planned for the X11 source packages. This seems a better option overall.
>

GNOME is already comprised of many source packages. I guess KDE is a
bigger problem, as it seems to have less and bigger source packages
and is C++, which is considerably more expensive to compile than C.

Rotty
--
Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Life is a sexually transmitted disease.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com