Debian Developers -

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > March 2005





Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 8:52 pmRe: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 8:52 pmBug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmBug#301083: ITP: libevolution-ruby -- revolution, ruby binding for the evolution mail
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmBug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known
Posts(7)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmquerying available package versions over the net
Posts(23)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmEmulated buildds (for SCC architectures)?
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmRe: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling .
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmBug#301061: ITP: apt-rpm -- tools to create APT RPM repository
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmBug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Co
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmBug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Co
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 6:10 pmBug#301041: apt-cache: dependency graph for build dependencies
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 7:48 amBug#300996: ITP: clamassassin -- simple wrapper for clamav
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 7:48 amRe: Documentation is/is not software [was: NEW ...]
Posts(2)March 23, 2005, 2:52 amQuick attempt to fix it
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 2:52 amRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(6)March 23, 2005, 2:52 amBug#299771: ITP: ttf-antp -- Antykwa Poltawskiego font family
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 2:52 amBug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Co
Posts(1)March 23, 2005, 2:52 amBug#300996: ITP: clamassassin -- clamassassin is a simple virus filter wrapper for cam
Posts(26)March 22, 2005, 8:48 pmUbuntu Patches
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:48 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:48 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(4)March 22, 2005, 8:48 pmblog location changed (who can change it on planet.d.o?)
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:48 pmRe: *** SPAM *** Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?)
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:48 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:48 pmBug#300986: ITP: libfax-hylafax-client-perl -- Fax::Hylafax::Client from CPAN - Perl c
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Documentation is/is not software [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Re: How to show $arch releaseability
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(52)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pm.d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates)
Posts(9)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmHow to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture)
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: How to show $arch releaseability
Posts(14)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amBuildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...)
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: How to show $arch releaseability
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: How to show $arch releaseability
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(2)March 22, 2005, 7:52 ampackaging vmwaredsp-1.1
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 7:52 amRe: *** SPAM *** Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?)
Posts(44)March 22, 2005, 2:51 amstatus of buildds?
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 2:51 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 2:51 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 2:51 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 2:51 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 2:51 amRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 22, 2005, 2:51 amBug#300828: ITP: gff2aplot -- pair-wise alignment-plots for genomic sequences in PostS
Posts(48)March 21, 2005, 8:47 pmNEW handling ...
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(63)March 21, 2005, 8:47 pmDo not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Release sarge now, or discuss etch issues? (was: Bits (Nybbles?)from the Vancouver
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(20)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmprocmail and Large File Support
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)
Posts(17)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pm*seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling .
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling .
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling .
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling .
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:04 pmRe: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling .
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:03 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:03 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(3)March 21, 2005, 6:03 pmmess in BTS
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:03 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:03 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 6:03 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(4)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amNEWS.Debian abuse
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amubuntu!
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amRe: Logs from the DPL debate posted, and a draft ballot
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 7:48 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 2:55 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 2:55 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 2:55 amRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 2:55 amRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 21, 2005, 2:55 amRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 8:47 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: [Debian-ppc64-devel] Call For Help - Please support the ppc64 architecture
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(2)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#300595: ITP: adesklets -- interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmBug#300578: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- Mozilla Firefox Arabic Language/Region P
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)
Posts(3)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pm[Proposal] $arch release assistants
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Posts(1)March 20, 2005, 5:56 pmRe: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
Posts(27)March 20, 2005, 7:48 amautomake/autoconf in build-dependencies
Posts(3)March 20, 2005, 7:48 amorphaning packages


Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com