|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > May 2005 > FW: Processing of tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
FW: Processing of tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes
|
|
| John Goerzen 2005-05-22, 5:49 pm |
| Can anyone tell me what this means, and who is trying to upload this to
Debian without even sending me a patch first?
----- Forwarded message from Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org> -----
From: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:30:38 -0400
To: jgoerzen@complete.org
Subject: Processing of tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes
PGP/GnuPG signature check failed on tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes
gpg: Signature made Sun May 22 14:24:08 2005 EDT using DSA key ID C5AA2301
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
(Exit status 2)
tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
Removing tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
----- End forwarded message -----
--
John Goerzen
Author, Foundations of Python Network Programming
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...il/-/1590593715
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Adrian Bunk 2005-05-22, 5:49 pm |
| On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what this means, and who is trying to upload this to
> Debian without even sending me a patch first?
This gpg key belongs to Jani Monoses (Cc'ed).
Perhaps he can tell what happened (looks like an accidental upload to
Debian instead of Ubuntu).
> ----- Forwarded message from Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org> -----
>
> From: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
> Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:30:38 -0400
> To: jgoerzen@complete.org
> Subject: Processing of tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes
>
> PGP/GnuPG signature check failed on tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes
> gpg: Signature made Sun May 22 14:24:08 2005 EDT using DSA key ID C5AA2301
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> (Exit status 2)
> tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
> Removing tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Your Debian queue daemon
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> John Goerzen
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
|
|
> This gpg key belongs to Jani Monoses (Cc'ed).
>
> Perhaps he can tell what happened (looks like an accidental upload to
> Debian instead of Ubuntu).
Indeed that's the case, sorry all
Jani
___________________________
Cv-ul tau ia 500 euro/luna!
http://500.myjob.ro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| John Goerzen 2005-05-23, 6:00 pm |
| On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:54:20AM +0300, Jani wrote:
>
>
> Indeed that's the case, sorry all
OK, no worries. But, you obviously have some patches. I'd encourage
you (and other ubuntu maintainers) to send your patches to the Debian
maintainers to possibly integrate into Debian.
Should make less work for Ubuntu in the future, and also improve the
quality of Debian. A win-win in my opinion.
-- John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Matt Zimmerman 2005-05-23, 6:00 pm |
| On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:07:24AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:54:20AM +0300, Jani wrote:
>
> OK, no worries. But, you obviously have some patches. I'd encourage
> you (and other ubuntu maintainers) to send your patches to the Debian
> maintainers to possibly integrate into Debian.
>
> Should make less work for Ubuntu in the future, and also improve the
> quality of Debian. A win-win in my opinion.
The only change in tla-load-dirs is the transition to Python 2.4 (i.e.,
Debian doesn't want it yet), but here you go:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/tla-load-dirs/
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
|
|
> OK, no worries. But, you obviously have some patches. I'd encourage
> you (and other ubuntu maintainers) to send your patches to the Debian
> maintainers to possibly integrate into Debian.
>
> Should make less work for Ubuntu in the future, and also improve the
> quality of Debian. A win-win in my opinion.
I (and other ubuntu maintainers) 100% agree  However in this case I only did a
s/2.3/2.4/g since ubuntu's default Python version is 2.4, the reason the package
did not build and was witholding darcs-buildpackage. I think this change is not
needed (yet) for debian.
Jani
___________________________
Cv-ul tau ia 500 euro/luna!
http://500.myjob.ro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Matthew Palmer 2005-05-25, 2:48 am |
| On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what this means, and who is trying to upload this to
> Debian without even sending me a patch first?
What it means: the Ubuntu maintainer for tla-load-dirs (sorry, don't know
who) managed to send their package in the direction of the Debian upload
queue instead of the Ubuntu one. I'm not sure why this happens, because an
Ubuntu maintainer should (I presume) change their dput/dupload defaults to
Ubuntu, and the dput/dupload packages in Ubuntu should probably have their
defaults changed to Ubuntu, not Debian.
As for the who, it should be easy enough to work out either from the given
public key ID:
> gpg: Signature made Sun May 22 14:24:08 2005 EDT using DSA key ID C5AA2301
or, alternately, using the packages.debian.org equivalent (it may have moved
to packages.ubuntu.com by now; if not, it has been mentioned here in the
past but I can't remember what the temporary URL is).
If I were online at the moment I'd hunt up the info for you, but I'm in a
train tunnel as I type. <grin>
- Matt
| |
| Colin Watson 2005-05-25, 7:49 am |
| On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:39:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> What it means: the Ubuntu maintainer for tla-load-dirs (sorry, don't know
> who) managed to send their package in the direction of the Debian upload
> queue instead of the Ubuntu one. I'm not sure why this happens, because an
> Ubuntu maintainer should (I presume) change their dput/dupload defaults to
> Ubuntu, and the dput/dupload packages in Ubuntu should probably have their
> defaults changed to Ubuntu, not Debian.
It requires two mistakes to actually get such an upload accepted (you
need to get the distribution wrong in debian/changelog, *and* you need
to get the upload target wrong). People have made one or other mistake
in the past, but I don't think anyone's managed both simultaneously yet.
Plus you have to be in both upload keyrings, which wasn't the case here.
Oliver Grawert changed the default Ubuntu dupload and dput
configurations yesterday, which we hope should make this less likely to
happen again.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Martin Pitt 2005-05-25, 7:49 am |
| Hi!
Colin Watson [2005-05-25 11:11 +0100]:
> On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:39:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> It requires two mistakes to actually get such an upload accepted (you
> need to get the distribution wrong in debian/changelog, *and* you need
> to get the upload target wrong). People have made one or other mistake
> in the past, but I don't think anyone's managed both simultaneously yet.
> Plus you have to be in both upload keyrings, which wasn't the case here.
Actually it's even a third required mistake: For Ubuntu we can only do
source-only uploads, Debian only accepts binary uploads.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
| |
| Adrian Bunk 2005-05-30, 7:53 am |
| On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:39:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> It requires two mistakes to actually get such an upload accepted (you
> need to get the distribution wrong in debian/changelog, *and* you need
> to get the upload target wrong). People have made one or other mistake
> in the past, but I don't think anyone's managed both simultaneously yet.
>...
Silly question:
Is the GPG check (that failed in this case) really after the parsing of
the file contents?
> Cheers,
> Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Colin Watson 2005-05-30, 7:53 am |
| On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:21:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Silly question:
> Is the GPG check (that failed in this case) really after the parsing of
> the file contents?
No; that's the very first check jennifer does. As I said in the first
line you trimmed from your quote, you have to be in both upload keyrings
for it to be an issue.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|