Debian Developers - Re: Release update: minor delay; no non-RC fixes; upgrade reports

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > May 2005 > Re: Release update: minor delay; no non-RC fixes; upgrade reports





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Release update: minor delay; no non-RC fixes; upgrade reports
Nigel Jones

2005-05-30, 7:53 am

http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.p...on&fullcomment=
=3Don&new=3D7

thats a decent unoffical count...

On 30/05/05, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:57:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>=20
> How do you measure RC bugs?
> If you only look at the output of the BTS - that's horribly wrong.
>=20
> Why?
>=20
> Because many bugs that are already fixed in sid and therefore closed are
> still present in sarge.
>=20
> Finding these issues is one of the prices for freezing testing
> instead of unstable [1].
>=20
> Since it seems noone of the release team bothered to pay this part of
> the price for the testing release process, I'm sometimes using one or
> two spare hours to go a bit through update_excuses and report half a
> dozen of such issues.
>=20
> Steve saw this, and before the latest release update he sent (which was
> the one before yours), he asked me in a private mail about a prediction
> how many such RC bugs I'd expect in sarge for inclusion in his release
> update.
>=20
> It seems my prediction about the number of such issues didn't match his
> wishes regarding the state of sarge, and he did therefore neither answer
> my email nor mention this in the release update nor does it seem he
> assigned a member of the release team to do this work properly.
>=20
> If you are using the testing release process, please do the work that is
> required for doing it properly.
>=20
> And if you'd have done it in time these issues were no longer present
> now that you announce the release date was only a few days ahead.
>=20
>=20
> TIA
> Adrian
>=20
> [1] And no, version tracking in the BTS wouldn't prevent this problem.
> In my experience, there are so many of these issues reported with
> a wrong version or manually closed or even without any bug report in
> the BTS that claiming version tracking might eliminate this problem
> sounds like a bad joke.
>=20
> --
>=20
> "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
> Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
>=20
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian=

..org
>=20
>=20



--=20
N Jones
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com