| Paul TBBle Hampson 2005-05-30, 5:52 pm |
| On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:19:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:04:51PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> ... that doesn't (and can't) in any way address the problem I described
> in my email.
Couldn't you just pull the changelog entries for each package that differs
between testing and unstable, pull the 'closes' entries for each of those, and
"voila"? Grab severities from the BTS, cull those which are still open, andyou
have a "hidden RC bug" count. True, you don't get those which were closed with
an email to control or -closes, but I'm sure it's only popular with people
who're already keeping sarge-only bugs open manually, or for non-bugs.
And it's very hard to count bugs that don't appear in the BTS. ^_^
Of course, "voila" may actually take a significant amount of time... but could
it be slower than the two hours it takes a human to do it?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE
8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
Paul.Hampson@Anu.edu.au
"No survivors? Then where do the stories come from I wonder?"
-- Capt. Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Caribbean"
This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
use, duplication and distribution.
-----------------------------------------------------------
|