Debian Developers - Re: Debian Project Leader report for 2005-07-07

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2005 > Re: Debian Project Leader report for 2005-07-07





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Debian Project Leader report for 2005-07-07
martin f krafft

2005-07-07, 7:56 am

> Sory that you get the mail twice now, martin, I accidentally sent
> the first one to you instead of the list -.-


Here's my (also) personal reply:

also sprach Michael Weyershäuser <thedude0001@gmx.de> [2005.07.07.1431 +0200]:
> I guess you were refering to chapter 6 of the Developers Reference,


No, I was refering to the policy.

> "Best packaging practices", or something like that. However, the
> Debian Policy doesn't state what is supposed to be a good practice
> but definitely lays out the borders within which every maintainer
> has to stay...


Sure. But I am talking about changes. Those are not made and then
everyone is expected to abide by them. Instead, they are catalysed
from common and proven strategies.

--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!

.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system

Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

never trust an operating system
for which you do not have the source.
-- source unknown

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com