Debian Developers - depending on itself -- bug?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2005 > depending on itself -- bug?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author depending on itself -- bug?
Joerg Sommer

2005-07-12, 7:56 am

Hi,

I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1

What's the reason for a package to depend on itself? This makes it hard
for deborphan to detect them as orphaned. Should check lintian on this?

Have a nice day, Jörg.
--
"Hey, dad, you see how this man can twist his fingers? Amazing, isn't
it?" "No, son, not really. He's been using Emacs for ten years..."


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Goswin von Brederlow

2005-07-12, 7:56 am

Joerg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
> field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
>
> What's the reason for a package to depend on itself? This makes it hard
> for deborphan to detect them as orphaned. Should check lintian on this?
>
> Have a nice day, Jörg.


Missing shlibs.local file and binaries in the lib package?

MfG
Goswin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Santiago Vila

2005-07-12, 7:56 am

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

> Joerg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> writes:
>=20
>=20
> Missing shlibs.local file and binaries in the lib package?


That would be only a "reason" for a build-depends on itself, but not for
a depends on itself.
Goswin von Brederlow

2005-07-12, 7:56 am

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:

> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>
> That would be only a "reason" for a build-depends on itself, but not for
> a depends on itself.


If the lib itself is also installed then dpkg-shlibs would find the
lib and lookup the shlibs info for the lib. Or not?

MfG
Goswin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Frank Lichtenheld

2005-07-12, 5:57 pm

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:22:30AM +0000, Joerg Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
> field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
>
> What's the reason for a package to depend on itself? This makes it hard
> for deborphan to detect them as orphaned. Should check lintian on this?


It should and it does...

djpig@djpigpb:/tmp$ lintian libgail-common_1.8.4-1_powerpc.deb
W: libgail-common: package-relation-with-self depends: libgail-common (>= 1.6.6)

Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Santiago Vila

2005-07-12, 5:57 pm

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
>
>
> If the lib itself is also installed then dpkg-shlibs would find the
> lib and lookup the shlibs info for the lib. Or not?


Ah, yes, I suppose. I was using the word "reason" as "justification",
not as "cause".

In either case, a package which depends on itself is almost surely a bug,
I would certainly welcome a lintian warning for that.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com