|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2005 > G++ transition page revived
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
G++ transition page revived
|
|
| Frank Lichtenheld 2005-07-12, 5:57 pm |
| Hi.
As many of you might remember, back in 2003 Matthew Wilcox created
an overview page for the last g++ transition from 2.95 to 3.2/3.3.
You can still find it at
http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/ (but the log file
seems to have suffered during the harddrive failure of gluck)
I think this has proven very helpful so I set up a only slightly
modified version for the current transition from 3.3 to 4.0.
You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~djpig/gcc-transition/
As you can see the numbers are currently frightening at best ;)
but with a combined effort we should be able to let that number
drop very quickly. Expect the next BSP announcements soon...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| deb-lists-z@robsims.com 2005-07-12, 5:57 pm |
| On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I think this has proven very helpful so I set up a only slightly
> modified version for the current transition from 3.3 to 4.0.
> You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~djpig/gcc-transition/
I think the addition of 4.0 numbers to that page would be interesting.
--
Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Frank Lichtenheld 2005-07-12, 5:57 pm |
| On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 09:50:38PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 July 2005 21:27, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> This listing seems to miss packages built with a certain compiler only on some
> architectures. That may be intentional.
Hmm, therefor the sentence "This listing is only for i386; other
architectures will vary somewhat" on the page... If someone
cooks up a more intelligent script that includes all arches
I will happily use it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Will Newton 2005-07-12, 5:57 pm |
| On Tuesday 12 July 2005 21:27, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi.
>
> As many of you might remember, back in 2003 Matthew Wilcox created
> an overview page for the last g++ transition from 2.95 to 3.2/3.3.
> You can still find it at
> http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/ (but the log file
> seems to have suffered during the harddrive failure of gluck)
This listing seems to miss packages built with a certain compiler only on some
architectures. That may be intentional.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Frank Lichtenheld 2005-07-12, 5:57 pm |
| On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0600, deb-lists-z@robsims.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> I think the addition of 4.0 numbers to that page would be interesting.
Added.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Goswin von Brederlow 2005-07-13, 2:48 am |
| Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> writes:
> I think this has proven very helpful so I set up a only slightly
> modified version for the current transition from 3.3 to 4.0.
> You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~djpig/gcc-transition/
Does anyone have a script to sort the list by Depends?
Preferably split them into into buckets that can be done in parallel.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Graham Wilson 2005-07-14, 2:49 am |
| On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0600, deb-lists-z@robsims.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> I think the addition of 4.0 numbers to that page would be interesting.
Is it possible (and would it be worthwhile) to show which packages don't
need to be recompiled, and which ones already have been?
--
gram
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Goswin von Brederlow 2005-07-14, 2:49 am |
| Graham Wilson <graham@mknod.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0600, deb-lists-z@robsims.com wrote:
>
> Is it possible (and would it be worthwhile) to show which packages don't
> need to be recompiled, and which ones already have been?
There should be nothing on that page that doesn't need to be
recompiled and things that already have been would be the requested
4.0 numbers.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|