|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2005 > Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues
|
|
| Daniel Schepler 2005-07-15, 6:06 pm |
| I'm planning to start making sure every package which fails to build
with the current toolchain has an RC bug submitted against it. In
most cases, this should simply involve setting Andreas Jochens'
already existing bugs to serious, although I'll confirm each before
doing this. Exceptions will include:
- Packages waiting on other packages to transition.
- Failures clearly due to glibc issues (e.g. invalid lvalue errors
caused by <rpc/xdr.h> ).
I might also do NMU's for some of the more important packages, with a
delay of 2 days, or 5 days minus the time since the last dependent
package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes
on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*.
By the way, any estimates on how long it will be before we get a glibc
upload correcting the problems mentioned above?
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Aurelien Jarno 2005-07-15, 8:52 pm |
| On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:00:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes
> on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*.
I have already NMUed opensp, but it is still in incoming because of the
new libosp4c2 package.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Daniel Schepler 2005-07-15, 8:52 pm |
| Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:00:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>
> I have already NMUed opensp, but it is still in incoming because of the
> new libosp4c2 package.
All right, I guess I should have checked that first. Anyway, jade is
now in DELAYED/2-day/.
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Philipp Kern 2005-07-15, 8:52 pm |
| On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 11:00 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I might also do NMU's for some of the more important packages, with a
> delay of 2 days, or 5 days minus the time since the last dependent
> package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes
> on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*.
I am currently working on getting Bradley Bell's C++ packages
transitioned. These include[1] the following:
gconfmm*, glademm*, glibmm*, gnome-vfsmm*, gnomemm*, gtkmm* and several
other *mm* libs.
On some I am waiting for the dependencies. But please contact Bradley
and me if you intend to NMU any of these.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
[1] The complete list: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=btb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|