Debian Developers - not starting daemons at boot: ln -s disabled

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > August 2005 > not starting daemons at boot: ln -s disabled





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author not starting daemons at boot: ln -s disabled
Dan Jacobson

2005-08-05, 8:48 pm

One way of having some daemons not start at boot (e.g., if we only use
our printer once a year) is to remove certain /etc/rc?.d/ links.

But the downsize is later, unless one keeps records, one isn't quite
sure of just what tampering one has done in /etc/rc?.d/

So in /etc/default/* we can set NO_START_AT_BOOT=1 etc., at least we
can see and comment what we did.

However there still is a way to know what we tampered with in
/etc/rc?.d/: instead of telling the user to just remove some links,
have them instead ln -s to /dev/null or better: /etc/init.d/disabled perhaps,
an empty file mode 555.

And those link manager programs could do the same.

So then one could see clearly that S20cwdaemon -> ../init.d/disabled
etc. Or use DISABLED for extra clarity.

Not as efficient as removing the link, but at least one can see what
one did later.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Steve Greenland

2005-08-06, 5:51 pm

On 05-Aug-05, 16:22 (CDT), Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org> wrote:
> One way of having some daemons not start at boot (e.g., if we only use
> our printer once a year) is to remove certain /etc/rc?.d/ links.
>
> But the downsize is later, unless one keeps records, one isn't quite
> sure of just what tampering one has done in /etc/rc?.d/


mv S20foo s20foo

Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
John Hasler

2005-08-06, 5:51 pm

Dan Jacobson writes:
> But the downsize is later, unless one keeps records, one isn't quite sure
> of just what tampering one has done in /etc/rc?.d/


Sysvconfig keeps records.
--
John Hasler


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Anthony DeRobertis

2005-08-07, 5:53 pm

Dan Jacobson wrote:
> One way of having some daemons not start at boot (e.g., if we only use
> our printer once a year) is to remove certain /etc/rc?.d/ links.


Hmmm, does init respect policy-rc.d? If so, it'd be fairly easy to do it
that way...


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Andrew Pollock

2005-08-10, 2:50 am

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:15:29PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Dan Jacobson writes:
>
> Sysvconfig keeps records.


Sweet. Now I get a Red Hat-like service command as well. Nice.

regards

Andrew


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com