| Wouter Verhelst 2005-08-08, 8:30 am |
| Op zo, 07-08-2005 te 09:43 -0700, schreef Russ Allbery:
> Paul Wise <pabs3@bonedaddy.net> writes:
>
>
>
> Bad package description. It tells me something I don't care about (namely
> the acronym expansion of LDAP) and none of the things I do care about (why
> would I want this package rather than some other directory server).
>
>
> Out of curiousity, why? I can't think of any reason to run FDS when we
> already have OpenLDAP, having had the experience of dealing with FDS's
> technological predecessor.
Having had experience dealing with OpenLDAP, I'd be happy to have
just /anything/ else.
That being said, there's nothing wrong with having multiple
implementations of the same thing -- on the contrary. We have multiple
implementations of DNS-servers, MTA's, MUA's, database servers,
browsers, user environments, and whatnot. Why not multiple LDAP servers?
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|