|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > August 2005 > Re: arch, svn, cvs
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: arch, svn, cvs
|
|
| martin f krafft 2005-08-30, 6:01 pm |
| also sprach Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> [2005.08.30.1404 +0200]:
> But I'm leaving the Arch (tla/baz/bzr) boat too - patch-oriented SCMs
> were fun, but very disappointing. There is a central design flaw in
> pure patch tracking, and neither Arch nor DARCS do anything about it:
> no matter how much you track patches merged, you need to be able to
> identify convergence. GIT does this so well by being
> identity-oriented, that you can do a ton of patch trading on top (via
> email, StGIT, quilt, whatever) and things still make sense after
> merging and remerging ad infinitum.
How does git aide you in identifying the differences in changes
between two trees?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
micro$oft windoze: proof that p. t. barnum was correct.
|
|
|
|
|