|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > August 2005 > Re: arch, svn, cvs
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: arch, svn, cvs
|
|
| martin f krafft 2005-08-30, 6:01 pm |
| also sprach Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> [2005.08.30.2346 +0200]:
> for the record, to avoid other folk getting confused - bzr isn't
> a 'patch orientated SCM'. bzr's design incorporates elements from
> all of the VCS systems around when the project was started (and
> updated since then) - its not derived from GNU Arch any more or
> less than its derived from monotone or subversion.
Could you please elaborate on this?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"perhaps debian is concerned more about technical excellence rather
than ease of use by breaking software. in the former we may excel.
in the latter we have to concede the field to microsoft. guess
where i want to go today?"
-- manoj srivastava
|
|
|
|
|