| Frank Küster 2006-01-13, 10:44 pm |
| Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank K=FCster wrote:
>
buggy[vbcol=seagreen]
g is[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> The dpkg changelog, maybe.
Thanks, it's #296026.
>
> It almost certainly wouldn't be. But it's quite possible for a different
> combination of package versions (with different maintainer script bugs) to
> be used on different autobuilders at a given moment.
Hm. But that doesn't explain why only a couple of formats failed to
build in tetex-bin's postinst in=20
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?...3D5.0.16-1&arc=
h=3Dhppa&stamp=3D1132626014&file=3Dlog&as=3Draw
and an other build try at the same time. If some formats build fine,
this means most parts of tetex-base must be installed properly; if
others fail, this means either a misconfiguration (rather unlikely on a
buildd) or missing files. Of course it was also on sarti.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
|