| Erinn Clark 2006-01-18, 5:56 pm |
| * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org> [2006:01:18 20:23 +0100]:
> Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org> writes:
>
> No, but the decision was only published in a posting to -private. The
> whole point of Joey's mail was to make the act of revoking posting
> permissions public (which I support, though I'm not too happy about the
> way it was done)
It's not possible for those of us not on -private to figure out what's
going on, really, but is it possible that it wasn't made public in an
effort to protect Andrew's privacy? Were I a listmaster, that would've
been one of my considerations, regardless of what he'd done to justify
the ban. I think it's potentially important that the rest of us know
some disciplinary action has been taken, but I can't say that it's
relevant to, say, his future employers.
(M-F-T: set to -project, *please* reply there.)
--
off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|