Debian Developers - Derivatives and the Version: field (Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubu

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > January 2006 > Derivatives and the Version: field (Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubu





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Derivatives and the Version: field (Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubu
Matt Zimmerman

2006-01-19, 6:25 pm

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:47:22PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> In any case, I want to note what has just happened here. You received
> a clear, easily implemented, request about what would be a wonderful
> contribution, and which is (from the Debian perspective) entirely
> non-controversial.
>
> Your response was not to say "yes, great!" but rather to argue about
> whether these are things Debian should care about, and protest that
> they are not valuable and take too much work.


What I saw was that a discussion with a practical point (treatment of the
Maintainer field) was sidetracked because you started to focus on the
Version field instead, and I asked you to justify your concern.

Furthermore, regardless of whether you think it is easy, a global change of
the Version field is not something that I can even consider making in the
middle of our short release cycle, so it really isn't much of a priority at
this time.

The Maintainer field is something that I may be able to do something about,
and I'm awaiting the results of Jeroen's poll on that.

--
- mdz


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Thomas Bushnell BSG

2006-01-20, 2:50 am

Matt Zimmerman <mdz@ubuntu.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:47:22PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> What I saw was that a discussion with a practical point (treatment of the
> Maintainer field) was sidetracked because you started to focus on the
> Version field instead, and I asked you to justify your concern.


I think both of these are important.

Even more important is certainly the bug-reporting issue, I think.

> Furthermore, regardless of whether you think it is easy, a global change of
> the Version field is not something that I can even consider making in the
> middle of our short release cycle, so it really isn't much of a priority at
> this time.


Of course, but all that takes is "ah, this makes sense, we'll look at
it for the next release; since that's a short cycle, it's not a long
wait."

I am extremely patient with the plea that doing something takes time
and energy, and so it will happen eventually but not right away.

Thomas


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com