Debian Developers - Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > January 2006 > Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Hamish Moffatt

2006-01-24, 7:51 am

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:35:19PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Christopher Martin wrote:
>
>
> If a simple majority can yell, "there is no inconsistency" then the 3:1
> requirement has little meaning. I think it'd be reasonable to request
> that people who believe [0] is wrong should produce reasoned arguments
> against it; to the best of my knowledge (and memory, of course), no one
> has done so.


Perhaps I'm missing something, but

> [0] http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/...Statement.xhtml


does not seem to specifically address why the DRM and transparent copies
requirements violate the DFSG. I would like to know what the argument
is, since it appears to be ok by the letter. Of course the spirit is
also important but open to interpretation.


Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com