| Blars Blarson 2006-10-30, 7:31 pm |
| In article <E1GeU9Z-0004Jl-54@scyw00225.scy001.de> mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de writes:
>On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:02:41 -0800, Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>
>wrote:
>
>So you really want to be manually informed about spam runs against the
>BTS? Don't you notice unusual activity in some rrd-based monitoring
>system?
If you have an idea for a new spamassassin rule that will get a
current spam run without triggering on non-spam, send it to
owner@bugs. Unfortunatly, much spam is now using anti-bayes tecniques
and is hard to catch without also getting non-spam.
I do see each message with a SA score >= -1, but at times I've been
days behind slogging through them.
--
Blars Blarson blarson@blars.org
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|