| Kurt Roeckx 2006-10-30, 7:31 pm |
| On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:36:56PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <E1GeU9Z-0004Jl-54@scyw00225.scy001.de> mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de writes:
>
> If you have an idea for a new spamassassin rule that will get a
> current spam run without triggering on non-spam, send it to
> owner@bugs. Unfortunatly, much spam is now using anti-bayes tecniques
> and is hard to catch without also getting non-spam.
>
> I do see each message with a SA score >= -1, but at times I've been
> days behind slogging through them.
Does that mean that we shouldn't report spam we see in the BTS? If I
now see spam going to a bugreport of mine, I always go and press the
"this bug log contains spam". Should I just not bother with it?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|