Debian Developers - Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > November 2006 > Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]
Josselin Mouette

2006-11-06, 7:19 am

Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 =E0 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a =E9crit :
> I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a
> feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay
> installed), and new installs don't need to get nfs-kernel-server as part
> of the *default* install. =20


We're not talking about the NFS server, but of the NFS client. And a
working NFS client is surely something we want as part of the default
install.

> If someone wants to run an nfs server, they
> can install an nfs server package, either nfs-kernel-server or
> nfs-user-server (no good reason to prefer one to the other).


nfs-user-server is deprecated. I think we shouldn't even ship it at all.
--=20
Josselin Mouette /\./\
pouet
pouet
=AB Sans puissance, la ma=EEtrise n'est rien. =BB
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com