Debian Developers - Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > November 2006 > Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
Russ Allbery

2006-11-06, 1:18 pm

Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:


[vbcol=seagreen]
> Why is that needed ?


It's in widespread use in both Debian scripts and in upstream scripts.
When we tried to warn about this behavior in lintian, it turned up
hundreds of packages and we got a lot of objections to the check on the
grounds that dash supports this construct and the only shell that doesn't
is posh. It seemed like the general consensus was that requiring that all
those scripts be modified to require bash was more trouble than it was
worth.

--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com